Iconic moments in Dambusters aviation prints

Outward-Bound-Canvas
My picture 'Duty bound' – now with two famous autographs on this canvas print – Client photo

High Wycombe, 13 May 2013

It ranks in certain quarters as possibly the most daring and audacious operation the RAF carried out during World War II. But when I asked American and German friends … they had never heard of it. 

Doing what I mostly do there is only one game in town this week: 70 years ago, on the night of 16/17 May 1943, nineteen specially modified Lancaster bombers of 617 Squadron flew at extremely low level across to the Ruhr and used a clever "bouncing bomb" against German dams, smashing two of them. 

There is of course far, far more to it than that. Not least the fact that five of the aircraft did not make it to their targets, and another three did not get back. Of the 133 aircrew, 53 were killed and another three taken prisoner. Many civilians also died – as they did most nights on both sides; there was a war on. 

Munro-and-Johnson-signing-Linda-Meredith-print-smI have been making a series of pictures about this operation, a number of which have been sold – some to magazines or other commercial outfits, and of course some to private individuals who want a slice of history on their walls. 

One such customer bought two canvas prints last week and took them along to a commemmorative signing event at a gallery the other day, then sent me photos (and some very kind words) afterwards.

One of his photos shows one of the Lancasters, AJ-T, crossing Holland just feet off the deck. It has been signed by the redoubtable Squadron Leader George 'Johnny' Johnson DFM RAF … who was the bomb aimer in that very aircraft. A weird thought. 

He also signed the other picture, showing a wave of three Lancasters heading out against the setting sun (top) – and it was countersigned by Squadron Leader Les Munro DSO DFC RNZAF, one of the pilots that night. 

Meanwhile …  

Another recipient of some of my prints took them along to the Dambusters reunion dinner, and very kindly sent me a couple of photographs (right).

They show one of my prints, as she put it, "being signed by two certain veterans". No prizes for guessing who they were.  These men are legendary and it is very humbling that they have put their names on some of my pictures. 

 The 70th anniversary of the operation also prompted various 'specials' among the aviation magazines. 

I was very pleased that the publishers Morton's of Horncastle selected one of my images (the one at the top of this post) to run as a double spread on the contents pages of the anniversary bookazine  they produced for the UK and US markets, with another picture – First Wave – also across two pages illustrating part of the story of the raid, written by Squadron Leader Clive Rowley MBE RAF (Retd). 

Another magazine used my picture of L for Leather over the Eder for the cover of their May/June 2013 issue, entitled The Dambusters:

The Armourer magazine cover MayJune 2013 CROP

—————————

 TO BUY PRINTS  of any of my works please visit www.flightartworks.com.

I do private commissions, for individual aircraft or bigger scenes. Publishers' enquiries are also welcome: many images are available already to license through the Alamy agency.

To get in touch visit the Contact page on my website. Find Flight Artworks on Facebook, and on Twitter @flightartworks.

Continue ReadingIconic moments in Dambusters aviation prints

RAF bomber prints find delighted new home

Lancaster-straggler-blog
Lone Lancaster © by Gary Eason 

High Wycombe, 4 Apr 2013 

You can imagine my delight at selling no fewer than three pictures in one go to a single buyer. 

This was only heightened when, shortly afterwards, someone wrote on my Facebook account:

"My son bought me three of your prints for Mother's Day - two of them from your Dambuster series. Absolutely stunning! I hope to take them with me to the 617 reunion dinner and get them signed by Mr Munro and Mr Johnson. Thank you, Gary."

How cool is that? 

A subsequent chat established that she herself had no direct connection with Number 617 Squadron (The Dam Busters) – that was through a friend.

She added: "My father was a rear gunner in Wellingtons. Shot down on his second op and taken POW. All this while still at an Operational Training Unit!"

I have promised there will be a Vickers Wellington picture when I get to it – not least because, as she observed, "the 'Welly' rarely gets a look in" yet it was a remarkably versatile aeroplane, I think the only one of its type in continuous production throughout the Second World War.  

In fact I plan a series of pictures of RAF and American heavy bombers from World War II, which do seem very popular. Is this glorifying what are – to be blunt – designed to be weapons of mass destruction? No, it is marking the efforts and in many cases extraordinary skill, ingenuity and sheer bravery of tens of thousands of young men in the most trying of circumstances. 

I intend to write a separate post about 617 Squadron. So for now, my heading picture features a solitary Avro Lancaster in the early morning light. 

—————————

 TO BUY PRINTS  of any of my works please visit www.flightartworks.com.

I do private commissions, for individual aircraft or bigger scenes. Publishers' enquiries are also welcome: many images are available already to license through the Alamy agency.

To get in touch visit the Contact page on my website. Find Flight Artworks on Facebook, and on Twitter @flightartworks.

Continue ReadingRAF bomber prints find delighted new home

Focus on specifics

Headlong-attack-v2-sm

"Headlong attack" © Gary Eason / Flight Artworks

High Wycombe, 11 Jan 2013

I have been remiss in updating the blog but that is partly because I've spent time getting a Flight Artworks page on Facebook off the ground. It has accrued some 200 'likes' as I write. 

There have been some very nice comments and so far as one can tell some resulting picture sales, which is a bonus. People have been kind enough to share some of the pictures on their own pages too, so that it has apparently touched the lives of more than 71,000 people, according to the statistics I get.

The other reason for not having written more is that I have been making more pictures! The process of researching and making these can take weeks because I like to portray specific incidents, and if I am going to do that I like to get the details correct. 

Take the Battle of Britain picture at the top of this post. The idea for this arose from reading No. 17 Squadron’s Operations Record Book for Sunday, 25 August 1940, which mentioned:  "F/O Count Czernin attacked a bunch of Me.110s head-on and destroyed three of them.”

He did what? Further reading on the subject revealed that Czernin allegedly achieved this in less than one minute. 

Guns

Following my usual approach I wanted to 'be there' in the skies above Weymouth in Dorset on the south coast of England on that August day. Portraying Czernin's Hurricane was relatively straightforward once I had decided on the point of view – and I figured that if I was going to convey the most powerful impression of a head-on attack I needed to be right with the attacker. 

For the first time in a picture I found myself with guns blazing. This raised a whole new set of challenges. For one thing, guns generally do not actually blaze, or not in daylight anyway. Hollywood fakes it. 

I could not think of a way to ascertain for certain what the ammunition load might have been in his particular Hurricane. Reading around the subject – not least Air Chief Marshall Hugh Dowding's review of the Battle - I reckon there would not have been any tracer bullets as such. Artistically, though, I was keen to have some visible acknowledgement that the gun button was being thumbed. 

It seemed most likely to me that the smoke trails from the incendiary ammo would give the desired effect without necessitating bright streaks through the sky. 

Secondly I had to have spent cartidge cases coming from the Hurricane's wings.  I based these on the firing rate of the eight .303 calibre guns. Reckoning that this was about 1,150 rounds per minute or 19 per second, you would see about 76 spent casings being ejected from each wing. 

Models

I then had to consider whom he was shooting at. Aside from being Bf 110s this was not clear, although I did know the Luftwaffe units involved.  Hough and Richards in their history, The Battle of Britain, note that he "had a field day with the Me. 110s of I/ZG2" and this would accord with the various German casualties noted in that remarkable catalogue, The Battle of Britain – Then and Now

Portraying these raised another obvious problem that required a departure from my accustomed way of working to date: there simply aren't any 110s flying around to form a photographic basis for the picture. I turned to models instead, and reworked my photos of them to add greater detail, colour, digital 'noise' and some motion blur. 

The rest of the aircraft in the wider scene were more straightforward but I still had to figure out who did what to whom at about the same time that afternoon, and recreate their roles. 

The background was one of my handy stash of cloudscapes.

I worked carefully on the overall composition – as usual rearranging elements and even flipping the whole thing to see it in a different light. I'm pleased with the overall effect of aircraft flying everywhere. 

As for the principle of portraying a specific incident: I think this is the right way to go. I know others produce generic scenes and these can look splendid and be really emotive.

But for me, if I'm going to show, say, a Spitfire, then to be at all realistic it has to be a particular type and it has to have some code letters on it at least, and as soon as you do that you are into depicting an individual aircraft and, more than likely, pilot.  In any case, the specific can also be generic ("a Battle of Britain dogfight", to take the example above) but it cannot readily work the other way round. 

The upshot of this approach in the case of one of my pictures was a phone call out of the blue from the current owner of one of the aircraft featured in it – the Mk IX Spitfire MH434.

This venerable aircraft is still flying. My picture showed it as it would have been in December 1943. The owner, Sarah Hanna of The Old Flying Machine Company, wanted to use the scene as their Christmas image for 2012 and it duly appeared on the mh434.com website

Here's to a happy and successful 2013.

 

Continue ReadingFocus on specifics

Aerial views

Action on 31 August 1940 flat4_pr_blog

Battle of Britain dogfight, featuring F/O Harold Bird-Wilson in his Mk 1 Hurricane

High Wycombe, 27 Sep 2012

Alongside my regular photography, taking in trips to the North East, the sailing Olympics in Weymouth and the Edinburgh Fringe, I've recently been putting a lot of effort into my new aviation project, Flight Artworks.

It is currently hosted on my main photography website but my intention is to spin it out into a separate venture with its own clear identity.

One of the responses to the pictures on my Facebook page asked,"Is this a Photograph or computer art?"  Well, given that I shoot and process digitally, you could say everything I make is "computer art".

But I know what he meant. In that sense – no, it isn't. All the elements of the pictures are photographic. They are then combined on a computer, and adapted to a greater or lesser extent as the scenario demands. So in that sense – yes, I suppose so. However I still need the photographs to work from.That picture of the Kent landscape? I took it from an aeroplane over Kent!

Hats off to those clever people who understand 3D software and can carve aircraft out of a block of digits entirely on the computer. But there's more to it than that. Almost all the purely digital creations that I've seen look like what they are. You can just tell. So it does please me when people look at mine and ask, "How has he done that?"

Spitfire Vb in progress_blog

Spitfire Vb in progress

I think a crucial aspect of this is my photographic background. Any photographer is a student of light. Light, not the camera, is the primary tool. What makes a thing look real is the play of light on its surfaces. The corollary being that an unrealistic play of light will make the whole look unreal.

When I think of a scenario I immediately think about how I can find and combine the elements that would be needed to real-ise it. In fact it can work the other way round: having the elements to hand suggests a scene that I might portray.

Half the fun is then in the research. As an aside, although I'm modelling virtually it turns out I have a lot in common with those who work in plastic to recreate past events – who do seem to exhibit a  passion for getting the minutiae correct.

I have also learnt just how easy it is to get it wrong. Spitfire wings? Don't get me started.  Ironically, often the wonderful old aircraft that are still flying around today, thanks to the tireless efforts of those who restore and preserve them, are not at all what they appear to be. 

But that's where the computer art takes over – and makes it possible to recreate them as they were in their heydays.

Everything from changing code letters and registration numbers, to bigger elements such as the cannon and wheel blisters on the wings, armament, props and exhausts – even the shape and size of the nose and cowling.  And in the case of a Type 464 Lancaster (for the Dambusters series), the bomb bay and mid-upper gun turret as well as numerous details such as fuselage windows, exhaust shrouds, aerials and pitot tubes.

I use primarily Photoshop. So, for those familiar with how it works, I typically would have dozens of separate layers going on which makes it easy to tweak various aspects or indeed re-use parts and change the coding or the extent of weathering or whether the guns have been fired and so on. 

 

Continue ReadingAerial views

What do spinning props look like?

Hurricane_scramble_panorama_flat_blog

'Another day': Hurricanes from 17 Squadron RAF in northern France, June 1940

What does a spinning aircraft propeller look like?

You’re thinking I’m daft. Anyone who’s ever seen even an office fan knows what a spinning prop looks like.

Right. It’s just a blurred disk.

So why is it that in almost every photograph you’ve ever seen of a prop aircraft you can not only see but in effect count the propeller blades?

The answer is obvious of course: photographs are a sliver in time and if you are going to catch a moving aircraft without showing it as a blur, you need to have a fast enough shutter speed that it will also ‘stop’ the propeller.

The effect of this will vary with the speed of the prop’s rotation – which in part depends on the different phases of flight – and of course the shutter speed.

So the question that I have been grappling with is: what looks ‘right’?  

Dead engine

I want to know because, in a new departure, I am developing a range of aviation-related digital pictures under the Flight Artworks brand. 

These are photographically based, but the source material features a motley variety of prop rotations – from the total blur (rare) to the stationary (which looks just silly in my opinion – as if the engine has seized in flight).

I found that, to render them into photographic (or photorealistic) backgrounds it was easier, usually, to recreate the spinning prop from scratch. So I could make it look like almost anything I wanted.

I debated with myself whether to mimic the effect of an artfully chosen shutter speed – good blur but with discrete blades visible – which a crack aviation photographer will usually strive for. Think Paul Bowen, for example: http://www.airtoair.net/gallery/gallery-bombers.htm.

Or whether to recreate what you actually would see if you were right there. After all, in a typical air-to-air scenario, where is the viewer? Hanging somehow in space?

After a faltering start I’ve plumped for the latter. In the Hurricanes image above - with the viewer standing on the ground, I suppose – I started with a single prop blade, painted the tip yellow, and spun it into a circle (this worked better than spinning three blades). Then once it was pasted onto an aircraft I resized it and altered the perspective to fit – and adjusted opacity right down. 

[UPDATE: 19 Feb 12]  In response to online discussion of this approach and a review of more photos, I then also added some reflected sunlight 'shimmer'. This needs to be related to the surrounding light but i think it adds a good sense of depth and movement to the props. 

But I’m far from being sure about all this. So comments welcome please. 

Continue ReadingWhat do spinning props look like?

End of content

No more pages to load